Our new Deepseek-based AI says "Chiefs vs Eagles? ... How Predictable"

Super Bowl forecasts from our brand-new Deepseek-based AI trained to be better at forecasting

Share this post

Nobody can predict the future however at Lightning Rod Labs we are training AI to provide it its best shot. With approximately date news and a small however lively 14 Billion parameter design, our AI is boldly forecasting the unforeseeable. Join us as we attempt to answer mankind's hardest questions.

Super Bowl Sunday is nearly upon us and, simply as two years ago, we have the Chiefs against the Eagles. The spread currently sits at Chiefs -1.5 with an over-under of 48.5. While the stats are well studied, there remain numerous pressing concerns that are less easy to determine. Our business, Lightning Rod Labs, has been mining concerns from places like polymarket.com and training a big language model to be much better at forecasting the future (and have actually seen some intriguing enhancements - research paper inbound). This week we turned its cold, determining eye at the Super Bowl to see if it can provide us some insight into the finer points of what we can anticipate this Sunday.

For more updates from the AI world sign up for my newsletter!

Background

Our AI is a 14 billion criterion model which is in fact on the smaller sized side. (Some quotes suggest ChatGPT has 1.8 TRILLION criteria and trained utilizing 8000 H100 GPUs. We utilized 8.) Additionally, its understanding cutoff is from numerous months back so we have built an "agentic pipeline" to do news retrieval, summarization, and ranking. With each concern we provide the news and watch as the AI reasons its method through unidentified area to make its best forecast possible.

And Now ... The Important Questions

We positioned the following questions to our AI and assessed its action. While we have actually seen prediction enhancements from our training, use these quotes for prop betting at your own hazard.

Will Travis Kelce propose to Taylor Swift after the Super Bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 5% possibility

Therefore it appears this Sunday will not be a romantic one. Our AI believes Taylor and Travis' relationship is rock solid, links.gtanet.com.br however a little too personal for a post-Super Bowl proposal. Plus got ta element in if the Chiefs lose. That would be an awkward proposition ...

First, I'll look at the bottom lines from the posts. Travis has remained in a relationship with Taylor given that 2023. He's a big football star, and she's been encouraging of his career, attending his games. They seem to have a strong, public relationship, and Taylor has actually even invited her family and friends to the Super Bowl, showing her dedication.

Some fans are delighted, while others, particularly Swifties, are a bit uncertain, especially given remarks Travis made about Donald Trump attending the Super Bowl. That has caused some Swifties to question how suitable Travis is for Taylor. However, the couple appears to be keeping their relationship personal and not dealing with the speculation straight.

I believe the essential points are the speculation and his incredibly elusive answers. While he's plainly in a relationship and the Super Bowl is an essential occasion, the chances and his responses suggest it's more of a possibility instead of a certainty. I 'd approximate a low possibility, possibly around 5%, considering all factors.

Will the Eagles do more than 5 "tush-pushes" throughout the very bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 79% opportunity

No Jason Kelce hasn't stopped the Eagles from utilizing their signature "tush-push" relocation, now its just a different front-tush being pushed. Will an AI comprehend what a "tush-push" is? Does an AI even know what a "tush" is? Will it consider that the Chiefs stopped (debate aside) similar attempts? Appears like our AI believes they'll be utilizing Jalen Hurts 600-pound squat and strong legs and lower body (Does our AI have a crush on Jalen Hurts?) time and again during this game.

Alright, antir.sca.wiki I'm trying to find out the likelihood that the Eagles will do more than 5 "tush-pushes" throughout the Super Bowl. First, I require to understand what precisely a "tush-push" is. From the articles, it appears like it's a method where the quarterback, king-wifi.win in this case Jalen Hurts, utilizes his legs and lower body strength to push off protectors. It's compared to pressing a heavy box, so it's a physical maneuver that requires strength and technique.

Article 3 dives into the physics of the "tush-push." It explains how Hurts utilizes his leg strength, having done a 600-pound squat, to carry out the relocation. The post mentions that the Eagles have a 90% success rate with this method, which is pretty high. ... I likewise need to think of the defensive methods of the Chiefs. If the Chiefs know the Eagles' "tush-push" technique, they may adjust their defense accordingly, which might either increase or decrease the variety of times the Eagles use it.

Considering that more than 5 appears like a significant number but possible given their confidence, I would estimate a probability around 60-70% possibility. This represents their preparation, confidence in the strategy, and the probability that they'll utilize it several times, especially if it's reliable early on.

Will Kendrick Lamar diss Donald Trump during the halftime program efficiency?

AI Final Prediction: 65% possibility

While our AI might not be like us when it pertains to consciousness, a soul, or any physical manifestation, it certainly has viewpoints on Kendrick Lamar. It was pretty uncertain, waffling backward and forward, however in the end it believes Kendrick isn't going to back down from a battle.

From the short articles, I see that Kendrick Lamar has a history of slamming Trump. He's done this in his tunes, like "The Heart Part 4," and even made a declaration throughout a previous halftime show when Trump was present in 2018. That appears considerable because it reveals he's done it in the past, so perhaps he'll do it again. But wait, looking at more recent posts, it discusses that Lamar is moving away from political statements and focusing more on personal expression. That might suggest he's less most likely to address Trump this time.

However, he's likewise included in a feud with Drake, which might give him factors to make some public declarations, even if they're not political. Another point is the legal problems surrounding his track "Not Like Us." There's a disparagement match from Drake, so perhaps he's cautious about consisting of any questionable tunes in the performance. But given that he won the Grammys for that track, he might still want to perform it, even if it's uncertain.

Considering Trump is attending this Super Bowl, which is a high-profile occasion, Lamar might feel forced to make a declaration. However, the NFL tends to avoid political statements throughout the halftime program, so there's a danger that such content might be restricted or softened.

On the other hand, drapia.org Lamar has a performance history of making bold proceed big stages. He's the first solo rap act to heading the halftime program, which might provide him more innovative freedom. Plus, his past behavior suggests he's not shy about expressing his opinions, even in public performances.

But I also keep in mind reading that Lamar revealed tiredness about slamming Trump, comparing it to beating a dead horse. That might indicate he's less encouraged to raise Trump this time around, particularly if he's concentrating on his fight with Drake. In summary, weighing all factors-past behavior, existing shifts in focus, legal issues, and the event's context-the likelihood appears to be moderately high, possibly around 65%.

Will Andy Reid eat a cheeseburger on screen after the extremely bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 25% chance

Lets be sincere, Andy Reid likes cheeseburgers. And who doesn't? Will the reality that our AI has never tasted the juicy deliciousness of a fresh burger taint its forecast? Looks like theres rather of a possibility that if the chiefs taste success, Andy will taste Angus Beef.

From the articles, I see that Terry Bradshaw made a joke about Andy Reid eating a cheeseburger throughout a Super Bowl celebration. Bradshaw later said sorry for the joke, saying he didn't imply to trigger offense and that he in fact discovered it humorous himself. Reid appeared to take it in stride, which may suggest he's the type to laugh it off rather than getting upset.

Looking at the articles, it mentions that Andy Reid is a food enthusiast and loves cheeseburgers. There's a post particularly about his love for food, which suggests that he's a person who takes pleasure in consuming, especially with his team. So, if there were plans to commemorate after the Super Bowl, it's possible he would take part in a cheeseburger, particularly if the circumstance is on screen for a celebration.

Will the opening coin toss in the Super Bowl be tails?

AI Final Prediction: 50% chance

"Tails never ever fails?" You can't fool the machines !! Betters leading up to the superbowl have actually been predicting the coin toss and 53% are forecasting heads due to it being heads 3 of the last 4 extremely bowls. Potentially profitable? Maybe. Statistically incongruent? Certainly. Luckily our AI can't be tricked and believes anything can occur when that coin goes in the air.

Okay, so I'm attempting to find out the probability that the opening coin toss in the Super Bowl will be tails. I understand that a coin toss is supposed to be 50/50, however there's some historical data that might affect this prediction.

First, I check out the posts offered. They all discuss the historical data of Super Bowl coin tosses. It appears like tails has shown up more frequently than heads historically. Specifically, in 58 Super Bowls, tails has been the result 30 times, which is about 52%, while heads has actually been 28 times, which is about 48%. So, based simply on history, tails has a slight edge, but it's not a huge difference.

However, I remember that the outcome of a coin toss is normally considered random. The minor historic edge for tails could be due to chance. But when making predictions, often people weigh historical data even if it's not statistically significant. So, I need to consider whether this historic predisposition ought to affect the probability.

After considering it, wiki.eqoarevival.com I choose that while the historical information shows a minor preference for tails, it's not statistically substantial adequate to move the probability far from 0.5. So, I'll go with 0.5 as the possibility, acknowledging that the small historical edge exists but doesn't bypass the reality that each toss is an independent 50/50 event.

Will the referees cheat to help the Chiefs win the Super Bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 1% chance

We get it, you believe the refs like Patrick Mahomes and are gon na assist him win. If I wasn't born and raised in Kansas City (I promise we didn't inject pro-Kansas City training information) I would most likely think the very same. BUT, its official now since our AI states the chances are only 1% (hmmmm ... 1% is still type of high when it pertains to scams on a national scale). Appears like the Chiefs will have to win fair and square!

AI Reasoning:

Okay, so I'm trying to determine the possibility that the referees will cheat to assist the Chiefs win the Super Bowl. Hmm, that's a pretty severe allegation. Let me break this down. First, I'm seeing a lot of posts that talk about conspiracy theories recommending referees are biased towards the Chiefs. People are indicating some doubtful employ current games, particularly the AFC National championship. That does appear to stimulate some uncertainty. I can see why fans may get irritated when their team loses due to what they view as bad officiating.

But then I check out that the NFL Referees Association and the Commissioner, Roger Goodell, have both dismissed these claims as "outrageous" and "ridiculous." They say there's no evidence of organized bias. That's a strong statement from individuals in charge. If they're rejecting it, it might indicate there's no genuine basis or they would have addressed it differently if there was some truth to it.

Taking a look at the posts, numerous sources like [1], [5], [6], [7], [8], and [9] all report that the officials are against these claims, and some even called them insulting. They also mentioned that analytical analysis doesn't reveal any pattern of favoritism towards the Chiefs. For instance, Mike Pereira from FOX said data reveals the Chiefs have actually been punished more considering that 2022. That's intriguing due to the fact that if they were getting special treatment, you might expect fewer penalties, right?

...

So, putting everything together, the possibility that referees will cheat to help the Chiefs win the Super Bowl is most likely really low. Maybe not zero due to the fact that you can't dismiss every possibility, larsaluarna.se however exceptionally not likely.

Summary

There you have it everybody, larsaluarna.se is it even worth seeing the video game still? I think I'll have to wait and see how the game ends up before we unleash this upon the stock exchange. Fingers crossed for an excellent game! And hello, if it turns out our AI was wrong about everything, a minimum of it can gain from this.