U.S. Diplomacy
Since its starting in 1922, Foreign Affairs has been the leading forum for serious conversation of American foreign policy and worldwide affairs. The magazine has actually featured contributions from numerous prominent global affairs professionals.

More Resources

- Feedback
- Institutional Subscriptions
- Gift a Subscription
- About Us
- Events
- Issue Archive
- Advertise
- Audio Content
- Account Management
- FAQs
Spy vs. AI

ANNE NEUBERGER is Deputy Assistant to the President and Deputy National Security Adviser for Cyber and Emerging Technology on the U.S. National Security Council. From 2009 to 2021, she served in senior functional roles in intelligence and cybersecurity at the National Security Agency, consisting of as its very first Chief Risk Officer.

- More by Anne Neuberger
Spy vs. AI

How Artificial Intelligence Will Remake Espionage

Anne Neuberger

-.
Copy Link Copied. Article link: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/united-states/spy-vs-aihttps://www.foreignaffairs.com/united-states/spy-vs-[ai](https://www.eventartist.com.au). Copy


Gift Link Copied. This is a subscriber-only feature. Subscribe now or Check in.


Create Citation Copied. Chicago MLA APSA APA. Chicago Cite not available at the moment. MLA Cite not available at the minute. APSA Cite not available at the minute. APA Cite not available at the minute


Download PDF. This is a subscriber-only feature. Subscribe now or Sign in.


Request Reprint. Request reprint permissions here.




In the early 1950s, the United States dealt with an important intelligence difficulty in its burgeoning competitors with the Soviet Union. Outdated German reconnaissance pictures from The second world war might no longer offer adequate intelligence about Soviet military capabilities, and existing U.S. security capabilities were no longer able to penetrate the Soviet Union's closed airspace. This shortage spurred an audacious moonshot effort: the advancement of the U-2 reconnaissance aircraft. In only a few years, U-2 objectives were delivering important intelligence, capturing pictures of Soviet missile installations in Cuba and bringing near-real-time insights from behind the Iron Curtain to the Oval Office.

Today, the United States stands at a similar juncture. Competition between Washington and its rivals over the future of the worldwide order is magnifying, and now, much as in the early 1950s, the United States should benefit from its first-rate personal sector and adequate capability for development to outcompete its adversaries. The U.S. intelligence community need to harness the nation's sources of strength to deliver insights to policymakers at the speed of today's world. The combination of expert system, especially through large language designs, uses groundbreaking opportunities to enhance intelligence operations and analysis, enabling the delivery of faster and more relevant assistance to decisionmakers. This technological revolution includes considerable downsides, however, particularly as adversaries exploit similar advancements to reveal and counter U.S. intelligence operations. With an AI race underway, the United States should challenge itself to be first-first to gain from AI, initially to secure itself from opponents who may use the technology for ill, and first to use AI in line with the laws and values of a democracy.

For the U.S. nationwide security neighborhood, kenpoguy.com fulfilling the promise and handling the danger of AI will need deep technological and cultural modifications and a determination to change the way companies work. The U.S. intelligence and military communities can harness the potential of AI while reducing its intrinsic risks, opentx.cz making sure that the United States maintains its competitive edge in a quickly evolving international landscape. Even as it does so, the United States need to transparently communicate to the American public, and to populations and partners worldwide, how the nation plans to fairly and securely utilize AI, in compliance with its laws and worths.

MORE, BETTER, FASTER

AI's potential to change the intelligence community depends on its capability to procedure and examine vast quantities of information at unprecedented speeds. It can be challenging to examine big quantities of collected data to generate time-sensitive cautions. U.S. intelligence services could utilize AI systems' pattern acknowledgment capabilities to identify and alert human analysts to potential hazards, such as missile launches or military movements, or crucial worldwide advancements that experts know senior U.S. decisionmakers are interested in. This capability would guarantee that crucial cautions are prompt, actionable, and relevant, allowing for more reliable responses to both rapidly emerging hazards and emerging policy chances. Multimodal models, which incorporate text, images, and audio, boost this analysis. For circumstances, utilizing AI to cross-reference satellite imagery with signals intelligence might offer a detailed view of military motions, allowing much faster and more accurate hazard assessments and possibly new methods of providing details to policymakers.

Intelligence analysts can likewise offload repeated and time-consuming tasks to makers to concentrate on the most fulfilling work: producing original and deeper analysis, increasing the intelligence community's general insights and productivity. A good example of this is foreign language translation. U.S. intelligence firms invested early in AI-powered abilities, and the bet has actually paid off. The capabilities of language designs have actually grown significantly sophisticated and accurate-OpenAI's recently released o1 and o3 designs showed significant development in accuracy and thinking ability-and can be utilized to much more quickly translate and sum up text, audio, and video files.

Although challenges remain, future systems trained on higher amounts of non-English information might be capable of discerning subtle distinctions in between dialects and understanding the significance and cultural context of slang or Internet memes. By depending on these tools, the intelligence community could concentrate on training a cadre of highly specialized linguists, who can be tough to find, often battle to get through the clearance process, and take a long period of time to train. And of course, by making more foreign language products available across the right firms, U.S. intelligence services would be able to faster triage the mountain of foreign intelligence they get to choose the needles in the haystack that truly matter.

The worth of such speed to policymakers can not be ignored. Models can swiftly sift through intelligence information sets, open-source details, and traditional human intelligence and produce draft summaries or preliminary analytical reports that experts can then verify and refine, guaranteeing the final products are both detailed and accurate. Analysts might coordinate with a sophisticated AI assistant to work through analytical issues, test ideas, and brainstorm in a collective fashion, enhancing each model of their analyses and delivering ended up intelligence more quickly.

Consider Israel's experience in January 2018, when its intelligence service, the Mossad, discreetly got into a secret Iranian center and stole about 20 percent of the archives that detailed Iran's nuclear activities between 1999 and 2003. According to Israeli authorities, the Mossad collected some 55,000 pages of documents and an additional 55,000 files saved on CDs, consisting of images and videos-nearly all in Farsi. Once the archive was obtained, senior officials positioned enormous pressure on intelligence specialists to produce detailed assessments of its content and whether it pointed to a continuous effort to build an Iranian bomb. But it took these professionals several months-and hundreds of hours of labor-to translate each page, evaluate it by hand for relevant content, and incorporate that details into assessments. With today's AI capabilities, the first two steps in that procedure could have been achieved within days, perhaps even hours, permitting experts to understand and contextualize the intelligence quickly.

Among the most fascinating applications is the method AI could change how intelligence is consumed by policymakers, allowing them to connect straight with intelligence reports through ChatGPT-like platforms. Such abilities would permit users to ask particular concerns and receive summed up, appropriate details from countless reports with source citations, helping them make informed decisions quickly.

BRAVE NEW WORLD

Although AI uses many benefits, it also positions considerable new threats, specifically as enemies develop comparable innovations. China's advancements in AI, particularly in computer system vision and surveillance, threaten U.S. intelligence operations. Because the country is ruled by an authoritarian program, it does not have personal privacy constraints and civil liberty securities. That deficit enables large-scale data collection practices that have yielded data sets of enormous size. Government-sanctioned AI designs are trained on huge amounts of personal and behavioral information that can then be used for different purposes, such as monitoring and social control. The presence of Chinese companies, such as Huawei, in telecoms systems and software application around the world could supply China with ready access to bulk data, especially bulk images that can be utilized to train facial recognition models, a particular concern in nations with large U.S. military bases. The U.S. nationwide security community need to think about how Chinese models developed on such extensive information sets can provide China a tactical advantage.

And it is not simply China. The proliferation of "open source" AI models, such as Meta's Llama and those produced by the French company Mistral AI and the Chinese company DeepSeek, is putting effective AI capabilities into the hands of users around the world at fairly affordable expenses. Much of these users are benign, but some are not-including authoritarian programs, cyber-hackers, and criminal gangs. These malign actors are utilizing big language models to quickly create and spread false and destructive content or to carry out cyberattacks. As experienced with other intelligence-related technologies, such as signals intercept capabilities and unmanned drones, China, Iran, and Russia will have every reward to share some of their AI developments with customer states and subnational groups, such as Hezbollah, Hamas, and the Wagner paramilitary company, thereby increasing the risk to the United States and its allies.

The U.S. military and intelligence community's AI models will end up being attractive targets for foes. As they grow more powerful and main to U.S. national security decision-making, intelligence AIs will become important nationwide possessions that should be protected against enemies looking for to compromise or manipulate them. The intelligence community need to invest in developing safe AI models and bybio.co in developing requirements for "red teaming" and continuous evaluation to safeguard against potential threats. These teams can use AI to mimic attacks, uncovering possible weaknesses and developing techniques to reduce them. Proactive steps, consisting of partnership with allies on and financial investment in counter-AI technologies, will be vital.

THE NEW NORMAL

These difficulties can not be wanted away. Waiting too long for AI technologies to fully mature carries its own threats; U.S. intelligence capacities will fall behind those of China, Russia, and other powers that are going complete steam ahead in developing AI. To make sure that intelligence-whether time-sensitive cautions or longer-term strategic insight-continues to be an advantage for the United States and its allies, the country's intelligence neighborhood requires to adjust and innovate. The intelligence services should rapidly master making use of AI technologies and make AI a foundational aspect in their work. This is the only sure way to guarantee that future U.S. presidents get the very best possible intelligence assistance, remain ahead of their adversaries, and safeguard the United States' delicate capabilities and operations. Implementing these changes will need a cultural shift within the intelligence community. Today, intelligence analysts mainly develop items from raw intelligence and data, with some assistance from existing AI designs for voice and imagery analysis. Moving on, intelligence officials ought to check out including a hybrid approach, in line with existing laws, utilizing AI models trained on unclassified commercially available data and fine-tuned with classified details. This amalgam of innovation and traditional intelligence gathering might lead to an AI entity providing instructions to imagery, signals, open source, and measurement systems on the basis of an incorporated view of regular and anomalous activity, automated images analysis, and automated voice translation.

To speed up the transition, intelligence leaders must promote the benefits of AI combination, highlighting the enhanced abilities and performance it provides. The cadre of freshly selected chief AI officers has been developed in U.S. intelligence and defense to serve as leads within their firms for promoting AI development and eliminating barriers to the technology's execution. Pilot tasks and early wins can develop momentum and self-confidence in AI's capabilities, motivating wider adoption. These officers can take advantage of the expertise of nationwide labs and other partners to evaluate and fine-tune AI designs, ensuring their efficiency and security. To institutionalize change, leaders should create other organizational rewards, including promos and training opportunities, to reward inventive approaches and those workers and systems that show effective usage of AI.

The White House has created the policy needed for using AI in nationwide security firms. President Joe Biden's 2023 executive order relating to safe, safe and secure, and reliable AI detailed the guidance needed to fairly and safely utilize the technology, and National Security Memorandum 25, issued in October 2024, is the nation's foundational technique for utilizing the power and handling the threats of AI to advance nationwide security. Now, Congress will need to do its part. Appropriations are required for departments and companies to produce the facilities required for development and experimentation, conduct and scale pilot activities and assessments, and continue to buy evaluation abilities to ensure that the United States is and high-performing AI technologies.

Intelligence and military communities are dedicated to keeping people at the heart of AI-assisted decision-making and have produced the frameworks and tools to do so. Agencies will need guidelines for how their analysts should use AI models to make certain that intelligence products meet the intelligence neighborhood's standards for reliability. The government will likewise need to maintain clear guidance for managing the data of U.S. citizens when it pertains to the training and usage of big language designs. It will be essential to balance making use of emerging innovations with safeguarding the personal privacy and civil liberties of people. This indicates enhancing oversight systems, upgrading relevant frameworks to show the abilities and dangers of AI, and fostering a culture of AI development within the national security apparatus that utilizes the capacity of the innovation while securing the rights and flexibilities that are foundational to American society.

Unlike the 1950s, when U.S. intelligence raced to the forefront of overhead and satellite images by establishing much of the essential technologies itself, winning the AI race will need that neighborhood to reimagine how it partners with private industry. The economic sector, which is the main means through which the government can understand AI progress at scale, is investing billions of dollars in AI-related research study, information centers, and calculating power. Given those companies' advancements, intelligence agencies ought to prioritize leveraging commercially available AI designs and improving them with categorized data. This technique makes it possible for the intelligence neighborhood to quickly expand its abilities without needing to start from scratch, permitting it to remain competitive with foes. A recent collaboration in between NASA and IBM to produce the world's biggest geospatial foundation model-and the subsequent release of the design to the AI community as an open-source project-is an exemplary demonstration of how this kind of public-private collaboration can operate in practice.

As the nationwide security community incorporates AI into its work, it needs to ensure the security and durability of its designs. Establishing requirements to deploy generative AI securely is crucial for maintaining the stability of AI-driven intelligence operations. This is a core focus of the National Security Agency's new AI Security Center and its partnership with the Department of Commerce's AI Safety Institute.

As the United States deals with growing rivalry to shape the future of the global order, it is urgent that its intelligence agencies and military capitalize on the nation's innovation and leadership in AI, focusing particularly on large language models, to supply faster and more appropriate details to policymakers. Only then will they gain the speed, breadth, and depth of insight required to navigate a more intricate, competitive, and content-rich world.