Spy Vs. AI
U.S. Foreign Policy
Since its founding in 1922, Foreign Affairs has been the leading forum for severe discussion of American diplomacy and global affairs. The magazine has actually featured contributions from lots of prominent global affairs experts.
More Resources
- Feedback
- Institutional Subscriptions
- Gift a Membership
- About Us
- Events
- Issue Archive
- Advertise
- Audio Content
- Account Management
- FAQs
Spy vs. AI
ANNE NEUBERGER is Deputy Assistant to the President and Deputy National Security Adviser for Cyber and Emerging Technology on the U.S. National Security Council. From 2009 to 2021, she served in senior functional roles in intelligence and cybersecurity at the National Security Agency, including as its first Chief Risk Officer.
- More by Anne Neuberger
Spy vs. AI
How Artificial Intelligence Will Remake Espionage
Anne Neuberger
-.
Copy Link Copied.
Article link: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/united-states/spy-vs-aihttps://www.foreignaffairs.com/united-states/spy-vs-[ai](https://pthlightinghome.com.vn).
Copy
Gift Link Copied.
This is a subscriber-only function. Subscribe now or Sign in.
Create Citation Copied.
Chicago MLA APSA APA.
Chicago Cite not available at the moment.
MLA Cite not available at the minute.
APSA Cite not available at the minute.
APA Cite not available at the minute
Download PDF.
This is a subscriber-only feature. Subscribe now or Check in.
Request Reprint.
Request reprint permissions here.
In the early 1950s, the United States faced an important intelligence challenge in its growing competitors with the Soviet Union. Outdated German reconnaissance images from World War II could no longer supply sufficient intelligence about Soviet military capabilities, and existing U.S. security capabilities were no longer able to penetrate the Soviet Union's closed airspace. This deficiency spurred an adventurous moonshot effort: the development of the U-2 reconnaissance aircraft. In just a couple of years, U-2 objectives were providing vital intelligence, recording pictures of Soviet rocket installations in Cuba and bringing near-real-time insights from behind the Iron Curtain to the Oval Office.
Today, the United States stands at a comparable point. Competition between Washington and its competitors over the future of the global order is intensifying, and now, much as in the early 1950s, the United States should take benefit of its first-rate private sector and ample capacity for innovation to outcompete its enemies. The U.S. intelligence community need to harness the nation's sources of strength to deliver insights to policymakers at the speed of today's world. The combination of expert system, particularly through large language models, provides groundbreaking opportunities to improve intelligence operations and analysis, allowing the delivery of faster and more relevant support to decisionmakers. This technological transformation features substantial drawbacks, nevertheless, specifically as foes exploit comparable advancements to reveal and counter U.S. intelligence operations. With an AI race underway, the United States must challenge itself to be first-first to gain from AI, initially to protect itself from opponents who may use the innovation for ill, and initially to utilize AI in line with the laws and worths of a democracy.
For the U.S. nationwide security neighborhood, satisfying the promise and managing the danger of AI will need deep technological and cultural modifications and a willingness to change the method agencies work. The U.S. intelligence and military neighborhoods can harness the potential of AI while mitigating its inherent risks, making sure that the United States maintains its one-upmanship in a rapidly developing international landscape. Even as it does so, the United States must transparently convey to the American public, and to populations and partners worldwide, how the nation means to fairly and securely utilize AI, in compliance with its laws and worths.
MORE, BETTER, FASTER
AI's capacity to revolutionize the intelligence neighborhood lies in its ability to procedure and analyze large amounts of data at unprecedented speeds. It can be challenging to analyze big amounts of gathered data to produce time-sensitive cautions. U.S. intelligence services could take advantage of AI systems' pattern acknowledgment capabilities to determine and alert human experts to possible hazards, such as missile launches or military movements, or essential worldwide developments that experts understand senior U.S. decisionmakers are interested in. This ability would ensure that important warnings are prompt, actionable, and pertinent, allowing for more effective reactions to both quickly emerging threats and emerging policy chances. Multimodal designs, which incorporate text, images, and audio, improve this analysis. For circumstances, using AI to cross-reference satellite images with signals intelligence might offer a detailed view of military motions, making it possible for faster and more precise risk assessments and possibly new means of providing details to policymakers.
Intelligence experts can also unload repeated and time-consuming tasks to machines to focus on the most satisfying work: producing original and deeper analysis, increasing the intelligence neighborhood's total insights and productivity. A fine example of this is foreign language translation. U.S. intelligence agencies invested early in AI-powered abilities, and the bet has paid off. The abilities of language designs have grown progressively sophisticated and accurate-OpenAI's recently launched o1 and o3 models showed considerable development in precision and reasoning ability-and can be utilized to even more rapidly translate and sum up text, audio, and video files.
Although obstacles remain, future systems trained on greater quantities of non-English information might be efficient in critical subtle distinctions in between dialects and understanding the significance and cultural context of slang or Internet memes. By relying on these tools, the intelligence community might concentrate on training a cadre of highly specialized linguists, who can be tough to find, frequently battle to survive the clearance procedure, and take a long time to train. And naturally, by making more foreign language materials available across the best agencies, U.S. intelligence services would have the ability to more rapidly triage the mountain of foreign intelligence they receive to pick out the needles in the haystack that actually matter.
The value of such speed to policymakers can not be undervalued. Models can swiftly sift through intelligence information sets, open-source details, and standard human intelligence and produce draft summaries or initial analytical reports that experts can then verify and improve, guaranteeing the last products are both detailed and precise. Analysts could team up with an advanced AI assistant to work through analytical issues, test concepts, and brainstorm in a collaborative style, enhancing each version of their analyses and delivering ended up intelligence faster.
Consider Israel's experience in January 2018, when its intelligence service, the Mossad, covertly broke into a secret Iranian facility and stole about 20 percent of the archives that detailed Iran's nuclear activities in between 1999 and 2003. According to Israeli authorities, the Mossad collected some 55,000 pages of documents and an additional 55,000 files saved on CDs, including photos and videos-nearly all in Farsi. Once the archive was obtained, senior officials placed tremendous pressure on intelligence experts to produce detailed assessments of its material and whether it pointed to an ongoing effort to develop an Iranian bomb. But it took these professionals numerous months-and numerous hours of labor-to equate each page, examine it by hand for appropriate material, and integrate that details into evaluations. With today's AI capabilities, the very first two steps in that process might have been achieved within days, maybe even hours, enabling experts to comprehend and contextualize the intelligence rapidly.
Among the most intriguing applications is the method AI might transform how intelligence is consumed by policymakers, enabling them to connect straight with intelligence reports through ChatGPT-like platforms. Such capabilities would permit users to ask specific concerns and get summed up, appropriate details from countless reports with source citations, helping them make notified decisions quickly.
BRAVE NEW WORLD
Although AI uses various advantages, it likewise poses significant new dangers, particularly as enemies establish comparable innovations. China's advancements in AI, especially in computer system vision and security, threaten U.S. intelligence operations. Because the country is ruled by an authoritarian regime, it lacks privacy constraints and civil liberty defenses. That deficit allows massive information collection practices that have yielded information sets of tremendous size. AI designs are trained on vast quantities of personal and behavioral data that can then be used for numerous purposes, such as monitoring and social control. The presence of Chinese business, such as Huawei, in telecommunications systems and software around the globe might supply China with ready access to bulk data, especially bulk images that can be used to train facial acknowledgment designs, a particular issue in nations with big U.S. military bases. The U.S. nationwide security community must think about how Chinese models constructed on such comprehensive information sets can provide China a tactical benefit.
And it is not simply China. The proliferation of "open source" AI designs, such as Meta's Llama and those created by the French company Mistral AI and the Chinese business DeepSeek, is putting effective AI abilities into the hands of users around the world at fairly budget friendly costs. A number of these users are benign, however some are not-including authoritarian programs, cyber-hackers, and criminal gangs. These malign stars are utilizing big language designs to quickly produce and spread incorrect and destructive material or to carry out cyberattacks. As experienced with other intelligence-related technologies, such as signals intercept capabilities and unmanned drones, China, Iran, and Russia will have every incentive to share some of their AI advancements with client states and subnational groups, such as Hezbollah, Hamas, and the Wagner paramilitary company, thereby increasing the danger to the United States and its allies.
The U.S. military and intelligence community's AI designs will end up being appealing targets for adversaries. As they grow more powerful and main to U.S. nationwide security decision-making, intelligence AIs will end up being important national properties that must be defended against foes looking for to jeopardize or manipulate them. The intelligence community should buy establishing safe AI designs and in developing standards for "red teaming" and continuous assessment to secure against possible hazards. These teams can use AI to replicate attacks, discovering prospective weaknesses and establishing strategies to alleviate them. Proactive steps, including cooperation with allies on and investment in counter-AI technologies, will be vital.
THE NEW NORMAL
These difficulties can not be wished away. Waiting too wish for AI innovations to completely mature brings its own dangers; U.S. intelligence capabilities will fall behind those of China, Russia, and other powers that are going full steam ahead in establishing AI. To make sure that intelligence-whether time-sensitive cautions or longer-term tactical insight-continues to be a benefit for the United States and its allies, the nation's intelligence community requires to adjust and innovate. The intelligence services must rapidly master making use of AI innovations and make AI a foundational aspect in their work. This is the only sure way to ensure that future U.S. presidents receive the best possible intelligence assistance, remain ahead of their foes, and safeguard the United States' delicate capabilities and operations. Implementing these modifications will need a cultural shift within the intelligence neighborhood. Today, intelligence analysts mainly develop items from raw intelligence and data, with some support from existing AI models for voice and imagery analysis. Moving forward, intelligence authorities need to check out consisting of a hybrid method, in line with existing laws, using AI models trained on unclassified commercially available information and fine-tuned with classified details. This amalgam of technology and conventional intelligence gathering might result in an AI entity supplying direction to imagery, signals, open source, and measurement systems on the basis of an integrated view of normal and anomalous activity, automated imagery analysis, and automatic voice translation.
To speed up the shift, intelligence leaders must promote the advantages of AI combination, highlighting the enhanced capabilities and performance it uses. The cadre of freshly appointed chief AI officers has actually been developed in U.S. intelligence and defense to function as leads within their firms for promoting AI innovation and getting rid of barriers to the innovation's implementation. Pilot tasks and early wins can build momentum and confidence in AI's capabilities, motivating more comprehensive adoption. These officers can take advantage of the knowledge of nationwide labs and other partners to test and fine-tune AI designs, ensuring their effectiveness and security. To institutionalize modification, leaders ought to create other organizational incentives, consisting of promos and training chances, to reward inventive approaches and those staff members and units that demonstrate efficient use of AI.
The White House has actually created the policy required for the use of AI in nationwide security firms. President Joe Biden's 2023 executive order concerning safe, safe, and trustworthy AI detailed the assistance required to fairly and safely use the technology, and National Security Memorandum 25, issued in October 2024, is the nation's foundational strategy for utilizing the power and managing the dangers of AI to advance nationwide security. Now, Congress will need to do its part. Appropriations are needed for departments and firms to develop the infrastructure required for wiki-tb-service.com innovation and experimentation, conduct and scale pilot activities and evaluations, and continue to purchase evaluation abilities to make sure that the United States is constructing reputable and high-performing AI technologies.
Intelligence and military neighborhoods are devoted to keeping human beings at the heart of AI-assisted decision-making and have actually developed the structures and tools to do so. Agencies will require guidelines for how their analysts ought to use AI models to make certain that intelligence items satisfy the intelligence neighborhood's requirements for reliability. The federal government will likewise need to maintain clear guidance for managing the data of U.S. citizens when it pertains to the training and usage of big language models. It will be necessary to balance making use of emerging technologies with securing the personal privacy and civil liberties of people. This indicates augmenting oversight systems, upgrading pertinent structures to reflect the abilities and dangers of AI, and promoting a culture of AI development within the national security apparatus that utilizes the potential of the technology while safeguarding the rights and freedoms that are foundational to American society.
Unlike the 1950s, when U.S. intelligence raced to the forefront of overhead and satellite imagery by developing a lot of the crucial technologies itself, winning the AI race will need that neighborhood to reimagine how it partners with personal market. The economic sector, which is the main ways through which the government can realize AI development at scale, is investing billions of dollars in AI-related research study, information centers, and calculating power. Given those business' advancements, intelligence agencies should prioritize leveraging commercially available AI designs and refining them with classified information. This technique allows the intelligence community to rapidly expand its capabilities without having to start from scratch, permitting it to remain competitive with enemies. A current cooperation in between NASA and IBM to produce the world's biggest geospatial foundation model-and the subsequent release of the model to the AI community as an open-source project-is an excellent demonstration of how this kind of public-private partnership can operate in practice.
As the national security neighborhood incorporates AI into its work, it should guarantee the security and durability of its designs. Establishing standards to release generative AI securely is important for maintaining the integrity of AI-driven intelligence operations. This is a core focus of the National Security Agency's new AI Security Center and its collaboration with the Department of Commerce's AI Safety Institute.
As the United States deals with growing rivalry to form the future of the global order, it is urgent that its intelligence firms and military capitalize on the nation's development and management in AI, focusing particularly on large language designs, to supply faster and more appropriate details to policymakers. Only then will they gain the speed, breadth, and depth of insight needed to navigate a more intricate, competitive, and content-rich world.