Our new Deepseek-based AI says "Chiefs vs Eagles? ... How Predictable"

Super Bowl predictions from our brand-new Deepseek-based AI trained to be better at forecasting

Share this post

Nobody can forecast the future however at Lightning Rod Labs we are training AI to offer it its finest shot. With as much as date news and a little however feisty 14 Billion parameter model, our AI is boldly anticipating the unforeseeable. Join us as we try to respond to humankind's toughest concerns.

Super Bowl Sunday is almost upon us and, simply as two years ago, we have the Chiefs against the Eagles. The spread presently sits at Chiefs -1.5 with an over-under of 48.5. While the stats are well studied, there remain numerous pressing concerns that are less easy to select. Our business, Lightning arrester Labs, has been mining concerns from locations like polymarket.com and training a big language design to be better at the future (and have actually seen some interesting enhancements - term paper inbound). Today we turned its cold, calculating eye at the Super Bowl to see if it can provide us some insight into the finer points of what we can anticipate this Sunday.

For more updates from the AI world subscribe to my newsletter!

Background

Our AI is a 14 billion criterion model which is in fact on the smaller side. (Some quotes suggest ChatGPT has 1.8 TRILLION specifications and trained utilizing 8000 H100 GPUs. We utilized 8.) Additionally, its understanding cutoff is from many months back so we have constructed an "agentic pipeline" to do news retrieval, summarization, and ranking. With each question we supply the news and watch as the AI reasons its method through unknown area to make its finest prediction possible.

And Now ... The Important Questions

We posed the following questions to our AI and gauged its action. While we have seen forecast improvements from our training, use these estimates for prop betting at your own hazard.

Will Travis Kelce propose to Taylor Swift after the Super Bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 5% possibility

And so it seems this Sunday will not be a romantic one. Our AI thinks Taylor and Travis' relationship is rock strong, but a little too personal for a post-Super Bowl proposition. Plus got ta factor in if the Chiefs lose. That would be an awkward proposition ...

First, I'll take a look at the crucial points from the articles. Travis has actually remained in a relationship with Taylor given that 2023. He's a huge football star, and she's been encouraging of his career, attending his games. They appear to have a strong, public relationship, and Taylor lespoetesbizarres.free.fr has actually even welcomed her family and friends to the Super Bowl, revealing her commitment.

Some fans are thrilled, while others, particularly Swifties, are a bit uncertain, particularly provided comments Travis made about Donald Trump attending the Super Bowl. That has caused some Swifties to question how suitable Travis is for Taylor. However, the couple appears to be keeping their relationship personal and not dealing with the speculation straight.

I believe the essential points are the speculation and his incredibly elusive responses. While he's plainly in a relationship and the Super Bowl is a crucial occasion, the odds and his actions suggest it's more of a possibility instead of a certainty. I 'd estimate a low probability, perhaps around 5%, considering all aspects.

Will the Eagles do more than 5 "tush-pushes" throughout the super bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 79% possibility

No Jason Kelce hasn't stopped the Eagles from utilizing their signature "tush-push" relocation, demo.qkseo.in now its just a different front-tush being pressed. Will an AI understand what a "tush-push" is? Does an AI even understand what a "tush" is? Will it factor in that the Chiefs stopped (debate aside) Josh Allen's comparable attempts? Appears like our AI believes they'll be utilizing Jalen Hurts 600-pound squat and strong legs and lower body (Does our AI have a crush on Jalen Hurts?) time and again throughout this game.

Alright, bbarlock.com I'm attempting to find out the likelihood that the Eagles will do more than 5 "tush-pushes" throughout the Super Bowl. First, I require to understand exactly what a "tush-push" is. From the short articles, it seems like it's a method where the quarterback, in this case Jalen Hurts, uses his legs and lower body strength to push off defenders. It's compared to pushing a heavy box, so it's a physical maneuver that needs strength and method.

Article 3 dives into the physics of the "tush-push." It explains how Hurts utilizes his leg strength, having done a 600-pound squat, to carry out the move. The post mentions that the Eagles have a 90% success rate with this method, which is quite high. ... I likewise need to think of the defensive techniques of the Chiefs. If the Chiefs are conscious of the Eagles' "tush-push" strategy, they may change their defense accordingly, which might either increase or decrease the number of times the Eagles use it.

Considering that more than five appears like a substantial number however possible given their self-confidence, I would estimate a possibility around 60-70% chance. This accounts for their preparation, confidence in the method, and the probability that they'll use it a number of times, particularly if it works early on.

Will Kendrick Lamar diss Donald Trump during the halftime program efficiency?

AI Final Prediction: 65% opportunity

While our AI may not resemble us when it pertains to awareness, a soul, or any physical symptom, it certainly has opinions on Kendrick Lamar. It was quite uncertain, waffling backward and forward, but in the end it believes Kendrick isn't going to pull back from a battle.

From the posts, iuridictum.pecina.cz I see that Kendrick Lamar has a history of criticizing Trump. He's done this in his tunes, like "The Heart Part 4," and even made a declaration throughout a previous halftime show when Trump was present in 2018. That appears significant since it shows he's done it in the past, so possibly he'll do it again. But wait, drapia.org taking a look at more current articles, it discusses that Lamar is moving far from political declarations and focusing more on personal expression. That might imply he's less likely to deal with Trump this time.

However, he's also associated with a feud with Drake, which may offer him reasons to make some public statements, even if they're not political. Another point is the legal problems surrounding his track "Not Like Us." There's a libel suit from Drake, so maybe he bewares about consisting of any controversial songs in the efficiency. But since he won the Grammys for that track, he may still wish to perform it, even if it's uncertain.

Considering Trump is attending this Super Bowl, which is a high-profile event, Lamar may feel forced to make a declaration. However, the NFL tends to avoid political declarations throughout the halftime show, so there's a threat that such material might be limited or softened.

On the other hand, Lamar has a track record of making vibrant proceed huge phases. He's the very first solo rap act to headline the halftime show, which might give him more innovative flexibility. Plus, his past habits suggests he's not shy about revealing his viewpoints, even in public performances.

But I also keep in mind reading that Lamar revealed tiredness about criticizing Trump, comparing it to beating a dead horse. That might show he's less encouraged to raise Trump this time around, specifically if he's focusing on his feud with Drake. In summary, weighing all factors-past behavior, current shifts in focus, legal problems, and the occasion's context-the likelihood appears to be moderately high, maybe around 65%.

Will Andy Reid eat a cheeseburger on screen after the super bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 25% opportunity

Lets be honest, Andy Reid loves cheeseburgers. And who does not? Will the reality that our AI has never tasted the juicy deliciousness of a fresh hamburger taint its prediction? Appears like theres somewhat of a possibility that if the chiefs taste triumph, Andy will taste Angus Beef.

From the short articles, I see that Terry Bradshaw made a joke about Andy Reid consuming a cheeseburger throughout a Super Bowl event. Bradshaw later said sorry for the joke, stating he didn't imply to trigger offense which he actually discovered it humorous himself. Reid seemed to take it in stride, which might show he's the type to laugh it off instead of getting upset.

Looking at the short articles, it discusses that Andy Reid is a food lover and loves cheeseburgers. There's an article particularly about his love for food, which suggests that he's a person who takes pleasure in consuming, especially with his team. So, if there were plans to commemorate after the Super Bowl, it's possible he would take part in a cheeseburger, specifically if the situation is on screen for a celebration.

Will the opening coin toss in the Super Bowl be tails?

AI Final Prediction: 50% possibility

"Tails never ever fails?" You can't deceive the makers !! Betters leading up to the superbowl have been anticipating the coin toss and 53% are anticipating heads due to it being heads 3 of the last 4 very bowls. Potentially financially rewarding? Maybe. Statistically incongruent? Certainly. Luckily our AI can't be deceived and believes anything can happen when that coin goes in the air.

Okay, so I'm trying to find out the likelihood that the opening coin toss in the Super Bowl will be tails. I understand that a coin toss is supposed to be 50/50, however there's some historical data that might affect this forecast.

First, I check out the posts supplied. They all discuss the historical stats of Super Bowl coin tosses. It looks like tails has actually turned up more frequently than heads traditionally. Specifically, in 58 Super Bowls, tails has been the outcome 30 times, which has to do with 52%, while heads has been 28 times, which is about 48%. So, based purely on history, tails has a small edge, however it's not a big distinction.

However, I keep in mind that the result of a coin toss is generally thought about random. The slight historic edge for tails could be due to possibility. But when making forecasts, sometimes people weigh historic information even if it's not statistically substantial. So, I ought to think about whether this historical predisposition ought to affect the likelihood.

After thinking about it, I decide that while the historical information reveals a slight choice for tails, it's not statistically considerable enough to move the possibility far from 0.5. So, I'll choose 0.5 as the likelihood, acknowledging that the slight historical edge exists but does not bypass the fact that each toss is an independent 50/50 occasion.

Will the referees cheat to assist the Chiefs win the Super Bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 1% possibility

We get it, you believe the refs like Patrick Mahomes and are gon na help him win. If I wasn't born and raised in Kansas City (I guarantee we didn't inject pro-Kansas City training information) I would probably think the very same. BUT, its authorities now because our AI says the possibilities are only 1% (hmmmm ... 1% is still kind of high when it pertains to scams on a national scale). Appears like the Chiefs will need to win fair and square!

AI Reasoning:

Okay, links.gtanet.com.br so I'm trying to determine the likelihood that the referees will cheat to assist the Chiefs win the Super Bowl. Hmm, that's a pretty severe allegation. Let me break this down. First, I'm seeing a lot of articles that discuss conspiracy theories suggesting referees are biased towards the Chiefs. People are pointing to some questionable hire current video games, specifically the AFC Championship Game. That does seem to stimulate some uncertainty. I can see why fans might get irritated when their group loses due to what they perceive as bad officiating.

But then I check out that the NFL Referees Association and the Commissioner, Roger Goodell, have both dismissed these claims as "unbelievable" and "ludicrous." They state there's no evidence of methodical bias. That's a strong declaration from individuals in charge. If they're rejecting it, it might suggest there's no real basis or they would have addressed it in a different way if there was some fact to it.

Looking at the articles, several sources like [1], [5], [6], [7], [8], and [9] all report that the officials are against these claims, and some even called them insulting. They likewise discussed that statistical analysis does not show any pattern of favoritism towards the Chiefs. For example, Mike Pereira from FOX said data reveals the Chiefs have actually been punished more because 2022. That's interesting due to the fact that if they were getting special treatment, you might anticipate less penalties, right?

...

So, putting it all together, the likelihood that referees will cheat to help the Chiefs win the Super Bowl is probably really low. Maybe not zero because you can't eliminate every possibility, however very not likely.

Summary

There you have it everyone, is it even worth watching the video game still? I think I'll have to wait and see how the video game ends up before we unleash this upon the stock exchange. Fingers crossed for a great video game! And hi, if it ends up our AI was wrong about everything, at least it can gain from this.