Our brand-new Deepseek-based AI says "Chiefs vs Eagles? ... How Predictable"

Super Bowl predictions from our brand-new Deepseek-based AI trained to be much better at forecasting

Share this post

No one can predict the future however at Lightning Rod Labs we are training AI to offer it its finest shot. With up to date news and a small however tough 14 Billion parameter model, our AI is boldly forecasting the unforeseeable. Join us as we attempt to answer humanity's toughest questions.

Super Bowl Sunday is nearly upon us and, just as 2 years back, we have the Chiefs against the Eagles. The spread presently sits at Chiefs -1.5 with an over-under of 48.5. While the statistics are well studied, there remain many pushing concerns that are less simple to select. Our business, Lightning Rod Labs, systemcheck-wiki.de has been mining concerns from locations like polymarket.com and training a big language design to be better at forecasting the future (and have actually seen some interesting enhancements - research paper inbound). Today we turned its cold, calculating eye at the Super Bowl to see if it can give us some insight into the finer points of what we can anticipate this Sunday.

For more updates from the AI world subscribe to my newsletter!

Background

Our AI is a 14 billion specification design which is actually on the smaller side. (Some estimates recommend ChatGPT has 1.8 TRILLION specifications and trained using 8000 H100 GPUs. We utilized 8.) Additionally, its knowledge cutoff is from numerous months back so we have built an "agentic pipeline" to do news retrieval, summarization, and ranking. With each question we provide the news and watch as the AI reasons its method through unknown territory to make its best prediction possible.

And Now ... The Important Questions

We positioned the following questions to our AI and gauged its reaction. While we have actually seen prediction enhancements from our training, use these quotes for prop wagering at your own hazard.

Will Travis Kelce propose to Taylor Swift after the Super Bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 5% opportunity

Therefore it seems this Sunday will not be a romantic one. Our AI thinks Taylor and Travis' relationship is rock solid, but a little too personal for a post-Super Bowl proposal. Plus got ta consider if the Chiefs lose. That would be an uncomfortable proposal ...

First, I'll take a look at the bottom lines from the short articles. Travis has remained in a relationship with Taylor considering that 2023. He's a huge football star, and she's been supportive of his profession, attending his games. They appear to have a strong, public relationship, and Taylor has even invited her buddies and family to the Super Bowl, revealing her dedication.

Some fans are excited, while others, especially Swifties, are a bit uncertain, especially offered remarks Travis made about Donald Trump participating in the Super Bowl. That has triggered some Swifties to question how suitable Travis is for Taylor. However, the couple appears to be keeping their relationship personal and not resolving the speculation straight.

I think the essential points are the speculation and his incredibly elusive responses. While he's plainly in a relationship and the Super Bowl is an essential occasion, the odds and his responses suggest it's more of a possibility instead of a certainty. I 'd estimate a low possibility, perhaps around 5%, considering all elements.

Will the Eagles do more than 5 "tush-pushes" during the very bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 79% possibility

No Jason Kelce hasn't stopped the Eagles from using their signature "tush-push" relocation, now its just a different front-tush being pushed. Will an AI understand what a "tush-push" is? Does an AI even know what a "tush" is? Will it consider that the Chiefs stopped (controversy aside) Josh Allen's similar attempts? Looks like our AI thinks they'll be using Jalen Hurts 600-pound squat and strong legs and lower body (Does our AI have a crush on Jalen Hurts?) time and again during this game.

Alright, I'm attempting to find out the probability that the Eagles will do more than 5 "tush-pushes" during the Super Bowl. First, I need to understand just what a "tush-push" is. From the posts, it appears like it's a strategy where the quarterback, in this case Jalen Hurts, uses his legs and lower body strength to push off defenders. It's compared to pushing a heavy box, so it's a physical maneuver that requires strength and technique.

Article 3 dives into the physics of the "tush-push." It explains how Hurts uses his leg strength, having actually done a 600-pound squat, to carry out the move. The post mentions that the Eagles have a 90% success rate with this technique, which is pretty high. ... I likewise need to think of the protective strategies of the Chiefs. If the Chiefs understand the Eagles' "tush-push" method, they may change their defense appropriately, iwatex.com which could either increase or reduce the variety of times the Eagles use it.

Considering that more than five looks like a significant number but possible provided their confidence, I would approximate a likelihood around 60-70% opportunity. This accounts for their preparation, self-confidence in the technique, and the likelihood that they'll utilize it a number of times, particularly if it works early on.

Will Kendrick Lamar diss Donald Trump throughout the halftime program efficiency?

AI Final Prediction: 65% possibility

While our AI might not be like us when it pertains to consciousness, a soul, or any physical manifestation, it certainly has opinions on Kendrick Lamar. It was quite uncertain, waffling back and forth, however in the end it believes Kendrick isn't going to pull back from a battle.

From the short articles, I see that Kendrick Lamar has a history of criticizing Trump. He's done this in his songs, like "The Heart Part 4," and even made a declaration during a previous halftime show when Trump existed in 2018. That appears considerable due to the fact that it reveals he's done it in the past, so maybe he'll do it again. But wait, taking a look at more recent articles, it mentions that Lamar is moving away from political declarations and focusing more on individual expression. That could indicate he's less likely to deal with Trump this time.

However, he's likewise associated with a fight with Drake, which may provide him factors to make some public declarations, even if they're not political. Another point is the legal problems surrounding his track "Not Like Us." There's a character assassination suit from Drake, so perhaps he bewares about including any questionable songs in the performance. But considering that he won the Grammys for that track, he might still wish to perform it, even if it's uncertain.

Considering Trump is attending this Super Bowl, which is a prominent event, animeportal.cl Lamar might feel obliged to make a statement. However, the NFL tends to prevent political statements during the halftime show, so there's a risk that such material might be limited or softened.

On the other hand, Lamar has a track record of making strong carry on big phases. He's the first solo rap act to headline the halftime show, which might give him more creative freedom. Plus, his past behavior recommends he's not shy about revealing his viewpoints, even in public performances.

But I also keep in mind reading that Lamar expressed fatigue about slamming Trump, comparing it to beating a dead horse. That could show he's less inspired to raise Trump this time around, specifically if he's concentrating on his feud with Drake. In summary, weighing all factors-past behavior, current shifts in focus, legal issues, and the occasion's context-the likelihood seems to be reasonably high, perhaps around 65%.

Will Andy Reid consume a cheeseburger on screen after the incredibly bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 25% opportunity

Lets be truthful, Andy Reid enjoys cheeseburgers. And who doesn't? Will the reality that our AI has never tasted the juicy deliciousness of a fresh burger taint its forecast? Appears like theres rather of an opportunity that if the chiefs taste triumph, Andy will taste Angus Beef.

From the articles, I see that Terry Bradshaw made a joke about consuming a cheeseburger throughout a Super Bowl event. Bradshaw later on said sorry for the joke, stating he didn't indicate to trigger offense and that he actually discovered it amusing himself. Reid appeared to take it in stride, which may indicate he's the type to laugh it off instead of getting upset.

Looking at the posts, it points out that Andy Reid is a food enthusiast and likes cheeseburgers. There's a post particularly about his love for food, which suggests that he's a person who delights in eating, particularly with his group. So, if there were plans to celebrate after the Super Bowl, it's possible he would take part in a cheeseburger, especially if the circumstance is on screen for a celebration.

Will the opening coin toss in the Super Bowl be tails?

AI Final Prediction: 50% possibility

"Tails never fails?" You can't fool the machines !! Betters leading up to the superbowl have been predicting the coin toss and 53% are predicting heads due to it being heads 3 of the last 4 super bowls. Potentially profitable? Maybe. Statistically incongruent? Certainly. Luckily our AI can't be tricked and believes anything can take place when that coin goes in the air.

Okay, so I'm attempting to determine the probability that the opening coin toss in the Super Bowl will be tails. I know that a coin toss is expected to be 50/50, however there's some historical data that may influence this forecast.

First, I go through the short articles provided. They all mention the historical statistics of Super Bowl coin tosses. It appears like tails has shown up regularly than heads traditionally. Specifically, in 58 Super Bowls, tails has actually been the result 30 times, which has to do with 52%, while heads has actually been 28 times, which has to do with 48%. So, based simply on history, tails has a minor edge, however it's not a huge difference.

However, I keep in mind that the outcome of a coin toss is usually considered random. The minor historical edge for tails might be due to chance. But when making predictions, sometimes individuals weigh historic information even if it's not statistically substantial. So, I must think about whether this historic bias needs to influence the likelihood.

After considering it, I decide that while the historical information shows a slight preference for tails, it's not statistically substantial adequate to move the possibility far from 0.5. So, I'll choose 0.5 as the probability, acknowledging that the small historic edge exists but doesn't override the fact that each toss is an independent 50/50 event.

Will the referees cheat to help the Chiefs win the Super Bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 1% chance

We get it, you think the refs like Patrick Mahomes and are gon na help him win. If I wasn't born and raised in Kansas City (I promise we didn't inject pro-Kansas City training information) I would probably believe the same. BUT, its official now since our AI states the possibilities are just 1% (hmmmm ... 1% is still sort of high when it pertains to scams on a national scale). Appears like the Chiefs will have to win fair and square!

AI Reasoning:

Okay, so I'm trying to find out the likelihood that the referees will cheat to assist the Chiefs win the Super Bowl. Hmm, that's a pretty serious allegation. Let me break this down. First, I'm seeing a lot of posts that speak about conspiracy theories recommending referees are prejudiced towards the Chiefs. People are indicating some questionable contact current games, especially the AFC Championship Game. That does seem to trigger some uncertainty. I can see why fans might get irritated when their team loses due to what they view as bad officiating.

But then I read that the NFL Referees Association and the Commissioner, Roger Goodell, have both dismissed these claims as "outrageous" and "ludicrous." They state there's no evidence of systematic bias. That's a strong declaration from the individuals in charge. If they're rejecting it, it may suggest there's no real basis or they would have addressed it differently if there was some reality to it.

Looking at the short articles, several sources like [1], [5], [6], [7], [8], and [9] all report that the officials are against these claims, and some even called them insulting. They also discussed that analytical analysis doesn't reveal any pattern of favoritism towards the Chiefs. For example, Mike Pereira from FOX said data reveals the Chiefs have actually been punished more considering that 2022. That's intriguing because if they were getting special treatment, you might expect less penalties, right?

...

So, putting everything together, the likelihood that referees will cheat to help the Chiefs win the Super Bowl is probably very low. Maybe not zero due to the fact that you can't eliminate every possibility, but very unlikely.

Summary

There you have it everybody, funsilo.date is it even worth seeing the video game still? I guess I'll need to wait and see how the game ends up before we release this upon the stock market. Fingers crossed for a great video game! And hello, if it turns out our AI was incorrect about everything, townshipmarket.co.za at least it can gain from this.