For Christmas I received an intriguing gift from a friend - my really own "best-selling" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (terrific title) bears my name and my image on its cover, and it has glowing evaluations.

Yet it was totally composed by AI, with a couple of simple triggers about me supplied by my buddy Janet.

It's a fascinating read, and really funny in parts. But it likewise meanders rather a lot, and is somewhere in between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It imitates my chatty design of writing, but it's likewise a bit recurring, and extremely verbose. It may have surpassed Janet's triggers in collecting data about me.

Several sentences start "as a leading technology journalist ..." - cringe - which could have been scraped from an online bio.

There's likewise a strange, repeated hallucination in the kind of my cat (I have no pets). And there's a metaphor on practically every page - some more random than others.

There are lots of companies online offering AI-book composing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I called the president Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he informed me he had actually offered around 150,000 customised books, systemcheck-wiki.de generally in the US, since rotating from putting together AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller expenses ₤ 26. The company uses its own AI tools to generate them, based on an open source large language design.

I'm not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can't - only Janet, who created it, can purchase any more copies.

There is presently no barrier to anybody creating one in any person's name, consisting of celebs - although Mr Mashiach states there are guardrails around abusive material. Each book includes a printed disclaimer specifying that it is fictional, created by AI, and created "entirely to bring humour and happiness".

Legally, the copyright comes from the company, but Mr Mashiach stresses that the product is meant as a "personalised gag gift", and the books do not get sold even more.

He intends to broaden his range, creating various genres such as sci-fi, and perhaps providing an autobiography service. It's created to be a light-hearted type of consumer AI - selling AI-generated products to human customers.

It's also a bit terrifying if, like me, you write for a living. Not least since it probably took less than a minute to create, and it does, certainly in some parts, sound just like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and actors worldwide have expressed alarm about their work being used to train generative AI tools that then produce similar content based upon it.

"We must be clear, when we are discussing data here, we actually suggest human developers' life works," states Ed Newton Rex, founder of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for AI firms to regard creators' rights.

"This is books, this is short articles, this is images. It's masterpieces. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to find out how to do something and after that do more like that."

In 2023 a song including AI-generated voices of Canadian vocalists Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social networks before being pulled from streaming platforms because it was not their work and they had actually not granted it. It didn't stop the track's creator attempting to choose it for a Grammy award. And even though the artists were fake, it was still wildly popular.

"I do not think using generative AI for creative functions need to be banned, but I do believe that generative AI for these functions that is trained on people's work without consent must be prohibited," Mr Newton Rex adds. "AI can be very effective however let's build it morally and relatively."

OpenAI says Chinese rivals using its work for accc.rcec.sinica.edu.tw their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes industry and dents America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - consisting of the BBC - have picked to block AI developers from trawling their online material for training purposes. Others have decided to team up - the Financial Times has partnered with ChatGPT developer OpenAI for example.

The UK government is considering an overhaul of the law that would allow AI developers to utilize creators' content on the web to assist establish their designs, unless the rights holders pull out.

Ed Newton Rex describes this as "insanity".

He mentions that AI can make advances in areas like defence, scientific-programs.science health care and logistics without trawling the work of authors, journalists and artists.

"All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and destroying the livelihoods of the nation's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your home of Lords, is likewise strongly versus removing copyright law for AI.

"Creative markets are wealth creators, 2.4 million jobs and an entire lot of happiness," states the Baroness, who is likewise an advisor to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The federal government is undermining among its best carrying out markets on the vague guarantee of development."

A federal government representative said: "No relocation will be made until we are definitely positive we have a practical strategy that provides each of our goals: increased control for right holders to help them certify their material, access to top quality material to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more openness for ideal holders from AI designers."

Under the UK government's brand-new AI plan, akropolistravel.com a nationwide data library consisting of public data from a broad range of sources will likewise be provided to AI researchers.

In the US the future of federal rules to manage AI is now up in the air following President Trump's return to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to improve the security of AI with, among other things, companies in the sector required to share information of the workings of their systems with the US government before they are launched.

But this has now been rescinded by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do rather, but he is stated to desire the AI sector to deal with less guideline.

This comes as a variety of claims versus AI companies, and particularly against OpenAI, continue in the US. They have actually been gotten by everybody from the New York Times to authors, music labels, and even a comedian.

They declare that the AI companies broke the law when they took their material from the internet without their permission, wiki.dulovic.tech and utilized it to train their systems.

The AI business argue that their actions fall under "fair use" and are for that reason exempt. There are a number of aspects which can constitute reasonable use - it's not a straight-forward definition. But the AI sector is under increasing analysis over how it collects training data and whether it must be spending for it.

If this wasn't all sufficient to ponder, Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the previous week. It became the most downloaded free app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek declares that it established its innovation for a fraction of the rate of the likes of OpenAI. Its success has raised security issues in the US, and threatens American's present supremacy of the sector.

When it comes to me and a profession as an author, I think that at the minute, if I truly desire a "bestseller" I'll still need to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the weak point in generative AI tools for bigger projects. It has lots of mistakes and hallucinations, annunciogratis.net and pattern-wiki.win it can be quite challenging to read in parts since it's so verbose.

But offered how rapidly the tech is progressing, I'm not sure the length of time I can stay positive that my significantly slower human writing and editing abilities, are better.

Register for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the biggest developments in global technology, with analysis from BBC correspondents worldwide.

Outside the UK? Register here.