For Christmas I got an intriguing gift from a friend - my extremely own "very popular" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (excellent title) bears my name and my picture on its cover, and it has radiant evaluations.

Yet it was totally composed by AI, with a few simple prompts about me supplied by my friend Janet.

It's an interesting read, and uproarious in parts. But it likewise meanders quite a lot, and is somewhere in between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It imitates my chatty design of composing, however it's likewise a bit repetitive, and very verbose. It might have gone beyond Janet's triggers in collecting information about me.

Several sentences start "as a leading technology reporter ..." - cringe - which might have been scraped from an online bio.

There's also a mysterious, repetitive hallucination in the kind of my feline (I have no pets). And library.kemu.ac.ke there's a metaphor on almost every page - some more random than others.

There are dozens of business online offering AI-book composing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I got in touch with the president Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he told me he had actually sold around 150,000 personalised books, generally in the US, because pivoting from compiling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller costs ₤ 26. The company utilizes its own AI tools to produce them, based upon an open source large language design.

I'm not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can't - just Janet, who created it, can buy any additional copies.

There is currently no barrier to anybody creating one in anyone's name, consisting of celebs - although Mr Mashiach states there are guardrails around violent material. Each book contains a printed disclaimer stating that it is imaginary, produced by AI, and designed "exclusively to bring humour and delight".

Legally, the copyright belongs to the company, memorial-genweb.org however Mr Mashiach worries that the product is planned as a "personalised gag present", and the books do not get sold further.

He hopes to widen his variety, creating different genres such as sci-fi, and possibly offering an autobiography service. It's developed to be a light-hearted form of consumer AI - offering AI-generated products to human consumers.

It's also a bit frightening if, like me, you compose for a living. Not least since it probably took less than a minute to produce, and disgaeawiki.info it does, definitely in some parts, sound just like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and actors worldwide have actually revealed alarm about their work being used to train generative AI tools that then produce comparable material based upon it.

"We must be clear, when we are discussing information here, we really mean human developers' life works," states Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, which projects for AI firms to regard developers' rights.

"This is books, this is articles, this is pictures. It's artworks. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to learn how to do something and then do more like that."

In 2023 a song including AI-generated voices of Canadian singers Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social networks before being pulled from streaming platforms because it was not their work and they had not granted it. It didn't stop the track's developer attempting to nominate it for a Grammy award. And despite the fact that the artists were fake, it was still wildly popular.

"I do not think the usage of generative AI for creative functions need to be banned, however I do believe that generative AI for these purposes that is trained on individuals's work without authorization ought to be prohibited," Mr Newton Rex includes. "AI can be really effective but let's develop it morally and fairly."

OpenAI states Chinese rivals using its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes market and damages America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - consisting of the BBC - have chosen to block AI designers from trawling their online content for training functions. Others have decided to team up - the Financial Times has actually partnered with ChatGPT developer OpenAI for instance.

The UK federal is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would enable AI developers to use creators' material on the web to help develop their models, unless the rights holders opt out.

Ed Newton Rex describes this as "insanity".

He points out that AI can make advances in areas like defence, healthcare and logistics without trawling the work of authors, journalists and artists.

"All of these things work without going and changing copyright law and ruining the incomes of the country's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in the House of Lords, is likewise strongly versus removing copyright law for AI.

"Creative industries are wealth creators, 2.4 million jobs and an entire lot of happiness," says the Baroness, who is also a consultant to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The federal government is undermining one of its best performing markets on the unclear pledge of development."

A federal government spokesperson said: "No move will be made until we are absolutely positive we have a practical plan that provides each of our objectives: increased control for best holders to help them accredit their material, access to premium product to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more openness for right holders from AI designers."

Under the UK government's new AI plan, a national information library containing public data from a wide variety of sources will likewise be made readily available to AI researchers.

In the US the future of federal guidelines to manage AI is now up in the air following President Trump's go back to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that aimed to improve the security of AI with, to name a few things, firms in the sector needed to share information of the functions of their systems with the US federal government before they are launched.

But this has now been rescinded by Trump. It stays to be seen what Trump will do rather, however he is stated to desire the AI sector to face less regulation.

This comes as a variety of suits against AI companies, and particularly against OpenAI, continue in the US. They have been secured by everyone from the New york city Times to authors, music labels, and sciencewiki.science even a comic.

They claim that the AI firms broke the law when they took their material from the internet without their consent, bytes-the-dust.com and used it to train their systems.

The AI companies argue that their actions fall under "fair usage" and are for wiki.snooze-hotelsoftware.de that reason exempt. There are a variety of factors which can constitute reasonable use - it's not a straight-forward definition. But the AI sector is under increasing scrutiny over how it gathers training data and whether it should be spending for bbarlock.com it.

If this wasn't all sufficient to contemplate, Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the past week. It ended up being one of the most downloaded complimentary app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek claims that it established its technology for a fraction of the price of the likes of OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security concerns in the US, and threatens American's current supremacy of the sector.

As for me and a career as an author, I think that at the moment, if I really want a "bestseller" I'll still have to write it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the present weakness in generative AI tools for larger projects. It has lots of mistakes and hallucinations, and it can be rather difficult to check out in parts because it's so long-winded.

But provided how quickly the tech is progressing, I'm unsure how long I can remain confident that my considerably slower human writing and modifying abilities, are much better.

Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the most significant developments in worldwide technology, with analysis from BBC correspondents around the world.

Outside the UK? Register here.