U.S. Foreign Policy
Since its founding in 1922, Foreign Affairs has actually been the leading forum for serious conversation of American diplomacy and global affairs. The magazine has included contributions from many leading global affairs experts.

More Resources

- Feedback
- Institutional Subscriptions
- Gift a Subscription
- About Us
- Events
- Issue Archive
- Advertise
- Audio Content
- Account Management
- FAQs
Spy vs. AI

ANNE NEUBERGER is Deputy Assistant to the President and Deputy National Security Adviser for Cyber and Emerging Technology on the U.S. National Security Council. From 2009 to 2021, she served in senior functional roles in intelligence and cybersecurity at the National Security Agency, consisting of as its first Chief Risk Officer.

- More by Anne Neuberger
Spy vs. AI

How Artificial Intelligence Will Remake Espionage

Anne Neuberger

-.
Copy Link Copied. Article link: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/united-states/spy-vs-aihttps://www.foreignaffairs.com/united-states/spy-vs-[ai](http://www.iway.lk). Copy


Gift Link Copied. This is a subscriber-only feature. Subscribe now or Check in.


Create Citation Copied. Chicago MLA APSA APA. Chicago Cite not available at the moment. MLA Cite not available at the minute. APSA Cite not available at the minute. APA Cite not available at the moment


Download PDF. This is a subscriber-only feature. Subscribe now or Check in.


Request Reprint. Request reprint permissions here.




In the early 1950s, the United States dealt with a vital intelligence obstacle in its growing competition with the Soviet Union. Outdated German reconnaissance photos from The second world war could no longer supply enough intelligence about Soviet military abilities, and existing U.S. security capabilities were no longer able to permeate the Soviet Union's closed airspace. This shortage spurred an audacious moonshot initiative: the development of the U-2 reconnaissance aircraft. In just a few years, U-2 missions were providing vital intelligence, recording pictures of Soviet missile installations in Cuba and bringing near-real-time insights from behind the Iron Curtain to the Oval Office.

Today, the United States stands at a comparable point. Competition in between Washington and its rivals over the future of the international order is magnifying, and now, much as in the early 1950s, experienciacortazar.com.ar the United States must benefit from its first-rate personal sector and ample capability for development to outcompete its enemies. The U.S. intelligence community must harness the country's sources of strength to deliver insights to policymakers at the speed these days's world. The combination of synthetic intelligence, especially through big language models, provides groundbreaking chances to enhance intelligence operations and analysis, allowing the delivery of faster and more pertinent assistance to decisionmakers. This technological transformation includes substantial drawbacks, however, particularly as enemies make use of comparable improvements to uncover and counter U.S. . With an AI race underway, the United States must challenge itself to be first-first to gain from AI, first to safeguard itself from enemies who may use the technology for ill, and first to utilize AI in line with the laws and values of a democracy.

For the U.S. nationwide security community, fulfilling the guarantee and handling the peril of AI will require deep technological and cultural modifications and a willingness to alter the way companies work. The U.S. intelligence and military communities can harness the potential of AI while reducing its fundamental threats, guaranteeing that the United States maintains its competitive edge in a rapidly evolving international landscape. Even as it does so, the United States need to transparently communicate to the American public, and to populations and partners around the globe, how the country means to fairly and safely use AI, in compliance with its laws and worths.

MORE, BETTER, FASTER

AI's capacity to transform the intelligence neighborhood lies in its capability to process and evaluate vast amounts of information at extraordinary speeds. It can be challenging to examine large quantities of gathered data to generate time-sensitive cautions. U.S. intelligence services might leverage AI systems' pattern acknowledgment abilities to recognize and alert human experts to prospective threats, such as missile launches or military movements, or important worldwide developments that analysts know senior U.S. decisionmakers have an interest in. This ability would guarantee that critical warnings are timely, actionable, and relevant, enabling more efficient responses to both quickly emerging hazards and emerging policy chances. Multimodal models, which incorporate text, images, and audio, enhance this analysis. For example, using AI to cross-reference satellite imagery with signals intelligence might offer a detailed view of military motions, making it possible for faster and more accurate hazard assessments and potentially brand-new methods of providing details to policymakers.

Intelligence analysts can also offload repeated and time-consuming tasks to machines to concentrate on the most satisfying work: creating initial and much deeper analysis, increasing the intelligence neighborhood's overall insights and productivity. A fine example of this is foreign language translation. U.S. intelligence agencies invested early in AI-powered capabilities, and the bet has actually paid off. The capabilities of language models have actually grown increasingly sophisticated and accurate-OpenAI's just recently launched o1 and o3 designs showed considerable progress in precision and thinking ability-and can be utilized to even more quickly equate and summarize text, audio, and video files.

Although difficulties remain, future systems trained on higher quantities of non-English information could be capable of critical subtle differences in between dialects and comprehending the significance and cultural context of slang or Internet memes. By relying on these tools, the intelligence community could focus on training a cadre of extremely specialized linguists, chessdatabase.science who can be difficult to discover, typically battle to survive the clearance procedure, and take a long period of time to train. And obviously, by making more foreign language products available across the ideal agencies, U.S. intelligence services would have the ability to more quickly triage the mountain of foreign intelligence they receive to choose the needles in the haystack that really matter.

The value of such speed to policymakers can not be undervalued. Models can swiftly sort through intelligence data sets, open-source details, and traditional human intelligence and produce draft summaries or preliminary analytical reports that experts can then verify and improve, guaranteeing the last products are both detailed and accurate. Analysts could team up with an innovative AI assistant to overcome analytical problems, test concepts, and brainstorm in a collective fashion, enhancing each iteration of their analyses and delivering finished intelligence faster.

Consider Israel's experience in January 2018, when its intelligence service, the Mossad, discreetly got into a secret Iranian center and took about 20 percent of the archives that detailed Iran's nuclear activities in between 1999 and 2003. According to Israeli authorities, the Mossad gathered some 55,000 pages of files and an additional 55,000 files saved on CDs, including images and videos-nearly all in Farsi. Once the archive was obtained, senior authorities positioned tremendous pressure on intelligence specialists to produce detailed evaluations of its content and whether it indicated an ongoing effort to develop an Iranian bomb. But it took these experts several months-and numerous hours of labor-to translate each page, examine it by hand for appropriate content, and include that details into assessments. With today's AI abilities, the very first 2 actions in that procedure might have been accomplished within days, perhaps even hours, allowing experts to understand and contextualize the intelligence quickly.

Among the most interesting applications is the method AI might transform how intelligence is taken in by policymakers, forum.batman.gainedge.org enabling them to connect straight with intelligence reports through ChatGPT-like platforms. Such capabilities would permit users to ask particular questions and get summarized, appropriate details from thousands of reports with source citations, helping them make notified decisions rapidly.

BRAVE NEW WORLD

Although AI provides numerous benefits, it likewise poses considerable brand-new risks, specifically as enemies develop comparable technologies. China's developments in AI, particularly in computer system vision and monitoring, threaten U.S. intelligence operations. Because the nation is ruled by an authoritarian regime, it does not have privacy constraints and civil liberty protections. That deficit makes it possible for large-scale data collection practices that have actually yielded data sets of enormous size. Government-sanctioned AI models are trained on vast quantities of individual and behavioral information that can then be used for numerous purposes, such as monitoring and social control. The presence of Chinese companies, such as Huawei, in telecoms systems and software application around the world might supply China with all set access to bulk data, especially bulk images that can be used to train facial recognition designs, a specific issue in countries with big U.S. military bases. The U.S. national security community must think about how Chinese models built on such comprehensive information sets can offer China a strategic advantage.

And it is not just China. The proliferation of "open source" AI models, such as Meta's Llama and those produced by the French company Mistral AI and the Chinese company DeepSeek, is putting effective AI capabilities into the hands of users throughout the world at fairly budget friendly costs. A lot of these users are benign, but some are not-including authoritarian programs, cyber-hackers, and criminal gangs. These malign stars are using large language models to quickly produce and spread incorrect and malicious material or to perform cyberattacks. As seen with other intelligence-related technologies, such as signals intercept abilities and unmanned drones, China, Iran, and Russia will have every reward to share a few of their AI developments with customer states and subnational groups, such as Hezbollah, Hamas, addsub.wiki and the Wagner paramilitary company, thus increasing the hazard to the United States and its allies.

The U.S. military and intelligence neighborhood's AI models will end up being appealing targets for foes. As they grow more powerful and main to U.S. nationwide security decision-making, intelligence AIs will end up being vital nationwide assets that should be defended against enemies seeking to compromise or manipulate them. The intelligence neighborhood must buy developing safe and secure AI designs and in establishing requirements for "red teaming" and constant evaluation to safeguard against prospective threats. These teams can utilize AI to replicate attacks, revealing possible weaknesses and establishing techniques to reduce them. Proactive procedures, including collaboration with allies on and investment in counter-AI technologies, will be important.

THE NEW NORMAL

These difficulties can not be wanted away. Waiting too long for AI innovations to completely mature brings its own dangers; U.S. intelligence capacities will fall back those of China, Russia, rocksoff.org and other powers that are going full steam ahead in developing AI. To ensure that intelligence-whether time-sensitive warnings or longer-term strategic insight-continues to be a benefit for the United States and its allies, the nation's intelligence neighborhood needs to adjust and innovate. The intelligence services should rapidly master using AI innovations and make AI a fundamental element in their work. This is the only sure method to guarantee that future U.S. presidents get the very best possible intelligence support, remain ahead of their enemies, and safeguard the United States' sensitive capabilities and operations. Implementing these changes will need a cultural shift within the intelligence neighborhood. Today, intelligence experts mainly construct products from raw intelligence and information, with some support from existing AI designs for voice and imagery analysis. Moving forward, intelligence officials must explore consisting of a hybrid approach, in line with existing laws, utilizing AI designs trained on unclassified commercially available information and refined with classified details. This amalgam of innovation and standard intelligence event could result in an AI entity offering direction to imagery, signals, open source, and measurement systems on the basis of an incorporated view of regular and anomalous activity, automated imagery analysis, and automatic voice translation.

To accelerate the shift, intelligence leaders should champion the advantages of AI integration, emphasizing the improved abilities and effectiveness it provides. The cadre of freshly selected chief AI officers has been developed in U.S. intelligence and defense to function as leads within their companies for promoting AI development and eliminating barriers to the technology's execution. Pilot projects and early wins can construct momentum and self-confidence in AI's capabilities, encouraging broader adoption. These officers can utilize the expertise of national labs and other partners to check and refine AI models, guaranteeing their efficiency and security. To institutionalise change, leaders need to develop other organizational rewards, including promotions and training opportunities, to reward inventive approaches and those staff members and systems that show efficient use of AI.

The White House has created the policy required for making use of AI in national security firms. President Joe Biden's 2023 executive order concerning safe, secure, and credible AI detailed the assistance needed to fairly and safely utilize the technology, and National Security Memorandum 25, issued in October 2024, is the country's foundational technique for harnessing the power and managing the risks of AI to advance national security. Now, Congress will require to do its part. Appropriations are required for departments and agencies to develop the infrastructure required for innovation and experimentation, conduct and asteroidsathome.net scale pilot activities and evaluations, and continue to buy evaluation abilities to ensure that the United States is building dependable and high-performing AI technologies.

Intelligence and military communities are committed to keeping people at the heart of AI-assisted decision-making and have created the structures and tools to do so. Agencies will need standards for how their analysts must utilize AI models to make certain that intelligence products satisfy the intelligence community's requirements for reliability. The government will also need to maintain clear guidance for managing the information of U.S. people when it pertains to the training and use of large language models. It will be essential to balance making use of emerging technologies with protecting the privacy and civil liberties of citizens. This suggests augmenting oversight mechanisms, upgrading pertinent frameworks to show the capabilities and threats of AI, and fostering a culture of AI development within the nationwide security apparatus that utilizes the capacity of the innovation while protecting the rights and flexibilities that are foundational to American society.

Unlike the 1950s, when U.S. intelligence raced to the leading edge of overhead and satellite images by establishing a number of the key technologies itself, winning the AI race will need that community to reimagine how it partners with private market. The economic sector, which is the main methods through which the government can understand AI progress at scale, is investing billions of dollars in AI-related research, data centers, and calculating power. Given those companies' developments, intelligence companies need to prioritize leveraging commercially available AI designs and fine-tuning them with classified information. This approach makes it possible for the intelligence neighborhood to quickly expand its capabilities without needing to start from scratch, permitting it to remain competitive with enemies. A recent collaboration between NASA and IBM to produce the world's largest geospatial structure model-and the subsequent release of the design to the AI neighborhood as an open-source project-is an excellent demonstration of how this type of public-private collaboration can work in practice.

As the nationwide security neighborhood incorporates AI into its work, it must ensure the security and strength of its models. Establishing standards to release generative AI securely is vital for maintaining the integrity of AI-driven intelligence operations. This is a core focus of the National Security Agency's new AI Security Center and its collaboration with the Department of Commerce's AI Safety Institute.

As the United States deals with growing rivalry to form the future of the international order, it is urgent that its intelligence agencies and military capitalize on the nation's innovation and leadership in AI, focusing especially on big language designs, to supply faster and more pertinent details to policymakers. Only then will they gain the speed, breadth, and depth of insight required to navigate a more intricate, competitive, and content-rich world.