For Christmas I got an interesting gift from a pal - my extremely own "best-selling" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (terrific title) bears my name and my picture on its cover, and it has glowing evaluations.

Yet it was totally composed by AI, with a couple of easy prompts about me provided by my friend Janet.

It's a fascinating read, and very amusing in parts. But it also meanders rather a lot, and is someplace in between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It imitates my chatty style of composing, but it's likewise a bit recurring, and extremely verbose. It might have surpassed Janet's prompts in collating data about me.

Several sentences start "as a leading technology reporter ..." - cringe - which might have been scraped from an online bio.

There's also a mysterious, repetitive hallucination in the type of my feline (I have no animals). And there's a metaphor on practically every page - some more random than others.

There are dozens of companies online offering AI-book composing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I got in touch with the primary executive Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he told me he had sold around 150,000 customised books, mainly in the US, given that pivoting from compiling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller costs ₤ 26. The company utilizes its own AI tools to create them, based on an open source large language model.

I'm not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can't - only Janet, who developed it, can buy any further copies.

There is currently no barrier to anybody creating one in anybody's name, consisting of celebs - although Mr Mashiach says there are guardrails around abusive material. Each book consists of a printed disclaimer specifying that it is imaginary, created by AI, and designed "solely to bring humour and pleasure".

Legally, the copyright belongs to the firm, however Mr Mashiach stresses that the item is intended as a "personalised gag present", and the books do not get offered further.

He wishes to widen his variety, generating various genres such as sci-fi, and perhaps using an autobiography service. It's developed to be a light-hearted kind of customer AI - selling AI-generated goods to human customers.

It's likewise a bit frightening if, like me, you write for a living. Not least due to the fact that it probably took less than a minute to generate, and it does, certainly in some parts, sound just like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and stars worldwide have actually expressed alarm about their work being used to train generative AI tools that then produce similar material based upon it.

"We should be clear, when we are talking about information here, we in fact suggest human developers' life works," states Ed Newton Rex, founder of Fairly Trained, which projects for AI firms to respect developers' rights.

"This is books, this is posts, this is photos. It's masterpieces. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to find out how to do something and then do more like that."

In 2023 a song including AI-generated voices of Canadian singers Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms since it was not their work and they had actually not granted it. It didn't stop the track's developer attempting to nominate it for a Grammy award. And despite the fact that the artists were fake, it was still extremely popular.

"I do not believe using generative AI for creative purposes should be banned, but I do believe that generative AI for these functions that is trained on individuals's work without permission must be banned," Mr Newton Rex adds. "AI can be extremely powerful but let's develop it ethically and fairly."

OpenAI says Chinese competitors utilizing its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: tandme.co.uk The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes market and dents America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - including the BBC - have actually selected to obstruct AI developers from trawling their online material for training purposes. Others have decided to work together - the Financial Times has actually partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for example.

The UK government is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would permit AI designers to use creators' material on the internet to assist establish their designs, unless the rights holders opt out.

Ed Newton Rex describes this as "insanity".

He explains that AI can make advances in areas like defence, healthcare and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.

"All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and ruining the livelihoods of the country's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your home of Lords, is also strongly versus eliminating copyright law for AI.

"Creative markets are wealth developers, 2.4 million tasks and a great deal of happiness," says the Baroness, who is also an advisor to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The federal government is weakening one of its finest carrying out industries on the unclear promise of development."

A government spokesperson stated: "No relocation will be made till we are definitely confident we have a useful plan that provides each of our goals: increased control for ideal holders to help them license their content, access to top quality material to train leading AI models in the UK, and more openness for ideal holders from AI designers."

Under the UK government's brand-new AI strategy, a national data library consisting of public information from a vast array of sources will likewise be made available to AI researchers.

In the US the future of federal rules to control AI is now up in the air following President Trump's go back to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that aimed to boost the safety of AI with, to name a few things, companies in the sector required to share details of the functions of their systems with the US federal government before they are launched.

But this has actually now been repealed by Trump. It stays to be seen what Trump will do instead, however he is said to desire the AI sector to face less regulation.

This comes as a number of suits versus AI companies, and especially against OpenAI, continue in the US. They have actually been secured by everybody from the New york city Times to authors, music labels, and even a comic.

They declare that the AI companies broke the law when they took their material from the internet without their permission, and utilized it to train their systems.

The AI companies argue that their actions fall under "reasonable usage" and are for that reason exempt. There are a number of aspects which can make up fair use - it's not a straight-forward definition. But the AI sector is under increasing analysis over how it collects training information and whether it should be paying for it.

If this wasn't all sufficient to consider, Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has shaken the sector over the previous week. It ended up being one of the most downloaded free app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek claims that it developed its technology for a fraction of the rate of the likes of OpenAI. Its success has raised security concerns in the US, and threatens American's current supremacy of the sector.

As for me and a career as an author, I think that at the minute, if I actually want a "bestseller" I'll still need to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the present weakness in generative AI tools for larger jobs. It is complete of and hallucinations, and it can be rather hard to check out in parts because it's so long-winded.

But given how rapidly the tech is evolving, I'm not sure for how long I can stay confident that my substantially slower human writing and modifying skills, are better.

Register for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the greatest advancements in worldwide technology, with analysis from BBC correspondents worldwide.

Outside the UK? Sign up here.