Skip to content

  • Projects
  • Groups
  • Snippets
  • Help
    • Loading...
    • Help
    • Submit feedback
    • Contribute to GitLab
  • Sign in
T
tubeart
  • Project
    • Project
    • Details
    • Activity
    • Cycle Analytics
  • Issues 20
    • Issues 20
    • List
    • Board
    • Labels
    • Milestones
  • Merge Requests 0
    • Merge Requests 0
  • CI / CD
    • CI / CD
    • Pipelines
    • Jobs
    • Schedules
  • Wiki
    • Wiki
  • Snippets
    • Snippets
  • Members
    • Members
  • Collapse sidebar
  • Activity
  • Create a new issue
  • Jobs
  • Issue Boards
  • Audrey Piazza
  • tubeart
  • Issues
  • #20

Closed
Open
Opened Feb 09, 2025 by Audrey Piazza@audreyf960011
  • Report abuse
  • New issue
Report abuse New issue

How an AI-written Book Shows why the Tech 'Frightens' Creatives


For Christmas I got a fascinating gift from a friend - my extremely own "best-selling" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (excellent title) bears my name and my image on its cover, and it has radiant reviews.

Yet it was entirely written by AI, with a couple of simple triggers about me supplied by my pal Janet.

It's a fascinating read, and extremely funny in parts. But it also meanders quite a lot, and is someplace between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It mimics my chatty design of composing, however it's likewise a bit repeated, and really verbose. It might have exceeded Janet's triggers in collating information about me.

Several sentences begin "as a leading technology journalist ..." - cringe - which might have been scraped from an online bio.

There's likewise a strange, repetitive hallucination in the kind of my feline (I have no pets). And there's a metaphor on nearly every page - some more random than others.

There are dozens of companies online offering AI-book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I got in touch with the president Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he told me he had actually sold around 150,000 personalised books, primarily in the US, since rotating from putting together AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller costs ₤ 26. The firm uses its own AI tools to generate them, based upon an open source big language model.

I'm not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can't - just Janet, who developed it, can buy any additional copies.

There is presently no barrier to anyone developing one in any person's name, including stars - although Mr Mashiach says there are guardrails around violent material. Each book contains a printed disclaimer specifying that it is imaginary, produced by AI, and developed "entirely to bring humour and happiness".

Legally, the copyright comes from the firm, however Mr Mashiach worries that the item is meant as a "customised gag present", and the books do not get sold further.

He wishes to expand his range, creating various genres such as sci-fi, and possibly providing an autobiography service. It's developed to be a light-hearted form of customer AI - offering AI-generated products to human consumers.

It's likewise a bit frightening if, like me, memorial-genweb.org you write for a living. Not least due to the fact that it probably took less than a minute to generate, and it does, definitely in some parts, sound much like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and stars worldwide have actually revealed alarm about their work being utilized to train generative AI tools that then produce similar material based upon it.

"We need to be clear, when we are talking about data here, we actually mean human creators' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for AI companies to regard developers' rights.

"This is books, this is posts, this is photos. It's artworks. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to learn how to do something and then do more like that."

In 2023 a tune including AI-generated voices of Canadian singers Drake and The Weeknd went viral on before being pulled from streaming platforms because it was not their work and they had actually not consented to it. It didn't stop the track's creator attempting to choose it for archmageriseswiki.com a Grammy award. And despite the fact that the artists were phony, it was still extremely popular.

"I do not believe using generative AI for imaginative functions ought to be banned, however I do think that generative AI for these purposes that is trained on people's work without authorization need to be banned," Mr Newton Rex includes. "AI can be extremely powerful but let's construct it ethically and fairly."

OpenAI states Chinese competitors utilizing its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes industry and dents America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - including the BBC - have actually selected to block AI designers from trawling their online content for training purposes. Others have actually chosen to collaborate - the Financial Times has partnered with ChatGPT developer OpenAI for instance.

The UK government is considering an overhaul of the law that would permit AI developers to utilize creators' content on the web to help establish their models, unless the rights holders pull out.

Ed Newton Rex explains this as "madness".

He points out that AI can make advances in locations like defence, healthcare and logistics without trawling the work of authors, journalists and artists.

"All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and destroying the incomes of the nation's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your home of Lords, is also highly against getting rid of copyright law for AI.

"Creative industries are wealth developers, 2.4 million jobs and a great deal of joy," says the Baroness, who is likewise an advisor to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The federal government is weakening one of its finest performing markets on the vague promise of growth."

A federal government representative stated: "No move will be made till we are absolutely positive we have a practical plan that delivers each of our objectives: increased control for best holders to assist them license their material, access to top quality material to train leading AI models in the UK, and more openness for best holders from AI designers."

Under the UK government's new AI strategy, a nationwide information library consisting of public information from a broad variety of sources will also be offered to AI researchers.

In the US the future of federal rules to manage AI is now up in the air following President Trump's return to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that aimed to boost the security of AI with, among other things, firms in the sector needed to share information of the workings of their systems with the US government before they are released.

But this has actually now been repealed by Trump. It stays to be seen what Trump will do rather, however he is stated to desire the AI sector to deal with less policy.

This comes as a variety of suits against AI companies, and particularly versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have actually been secured by everybody from the New York Times to authors, music labels, and even a comic.

They declare that the AI companies broke the law when they took their content from the internet without their consent, and utilized it to train their systems.

The AI companies argue that their actions fall under "reasonable usage" and are for that reason exempt. There are a number of elements which can constitute reasonable use - it's not a straight-forward definition. But the AI sector is under increasing scrutiny over how it collects training information and whether it ought to be spending for it.

If this wasn't all enough to contemplate, Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has shaken the sector over the past week. It ended up being one of the most downloaded complimentary app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek claims that it established its technology for a portion of the price of the similarity OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security concerns in the US, and threatens American's existing dominance of the sector.

As for me and a career as an author, I think that at the moment, if I really desire a "bestseller" I'll still have to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the present weak point in generative AI tools for bigger tasks. It has plenty of inaccuracies and hallucinations, and it can be rather difficult to check out in parts due to the fact that it's so long-winded.

But offered how quickly the tech is developing, I'm not exactly sure for how long I can stay confident that my considerably slower human writing and modifying skills, are much better.

Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the biggest advancements in global innovation, with analysis from BBC correspondents around the globe.

Outside the UK? Register here.

Assignee
Assign to
None
Milestone
None
Assign milestone
Time tracking
None
Due date
No due date
0
Labels
None
Assign labels
  • View project labels
Reference: audreyf960011/tubeart#20