For Christmas I got an intriguing present from a good friend - my extremely own "best-selling" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (fantastic title) bears my name and my photo on its cover, and brotato.wiki.spellsandguns.com it has radiant reviews.

Yet it was entirely composed by AI, with a few basic prompts about me supplied by my pal Janet.

It's an interesting read, and very funny in parts. But it likewise meanders rather a lot, and is somewhere between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It mimics my chatty design of writing, but it's likewise a bit repeated, and very verbose. It might have surpassed Janet's triggers in collating data about me.

Several sentences begin "as a leading technology journalist ..." - cringe - which could have been scraped from an online bio.

There's also a strange, repeated hallucination in the type of my cat (I have no pets). And there's a metaphor on practically every page - some more random than others.

There are dozens of business online offering AI-book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I called the president Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, wikibase.imfd.cl he told me he had actually sold around 150,000 customised books, generally in the US, given that rotating from compiling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller expenses ₤ 26. The company uses its own AI tools to produce them, based upon an open source large language model.

I'm not asking you to purchase my book. Actually you can't - just Janet, who created it, can purchase any additional copies.

There is presently no barrier to anyone developing one in any person's name, consisting of celebrities - although Mr Mashiach states there are guardrails around abusive content. Each book includes a printed disclaimer mentioning that it is fictional, produced by AI, and designed "solely to bring humour and joy".

Legally, the copyright comes from the firm, but Mr Mashiach worries that the item is planned as a "customised gag present", and the books do not get offered further.

He intends to broaden his variety, producing different genres such as sci-fi, and maybe using an autobiography service. It's developed to be a light-hearted type of consumer AI - offering AI-generated items to human consumers.

It's also a bit terrifying if, like me, you write for a living. Not least since it probably took less than a minute to generate, and it does, certainly in some parts, sound just like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and actors worldwide have actually expressed alarm about their work being utilized to train generative AI tools that then churn out similar content based upon it.

"We should be clear, when we are discussing information here, we in fact suggest human creators' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, founder of Fairly Trained, which projects for AI companies to regard creators' rights.

"This is books, this is short articles, this is images. It's masterpieces. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to learn how to do something and then do more like that."

In 2023 a tune featuring AI-generated voices of Canadian vocalists Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social networks before being pulled from streaming platforms due to the fact that it was not their work and they had not consented to it. It didn't stop the track's creator trying to nominate it for a Grammy award. And even though the artists were fake, it was still wildly popular.

"I do not think the usage of generative AI for innovative functions must be prohibited, however I do believe that generative AI for these purposes that is trained on individuals's work without permission should be banned," Mr Newton Rex includes. "AI can be very effective however let's build it morally and relatively."

OpenAI states Chinese competitors utilizing its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes market and dents America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - consisting of the BBC - have actually picked to obstruct AI designers from trawling their online material for training purposes. Others have chosen to collaborate - the Financial Times has actually partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for instance.

The UK government is considering an overhaul of the law that would enable AI designers to use creators' material on the internet to assist develop their models, videochatforum.ro unless the rights holders pull out.

Ed Newton Rex explains this as "madness".

He points out that AI can make advances in areas like defence, health care and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.

"All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and messing up the incomes of the nation's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your home of Lords, is likewise highly against removing copyright law for AI.

"Creative markets are wealth developers, 2.4 million tasks and a whole lot of pleasure," states the Baroness, who is likewise an advisor to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The federal government is weakening among its finest performing industries on the unclear pledge of growth."

A government representative stated: "No move will be made up until we are absolutely confident we have a useful plan that delivers each of our goals: increased control for best holders to help them license their content, access to top quality product to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more transparency for ideal holders from AI developers."

Under the UK federal government's new AI plan, a national data library including public data from a broad range of sources will also be offered to AI scientists.

In the US the future of federal guidelines to control AI is now up in the air following President Trump's return to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that aimed to boost the safety of AI with, to name a few things, firms in the sector required to share details of the functions of their systems with the US government before they are released.

But this has actually now been repealed by Trump. It stays to be seen what Trump will do instead, but he is said to want the AI sector to face less guideline.

This comes as a variety of suits against AI firms, and particularly versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have actually been taken out by everyone from the New york city Times to authors, music labels, and even a comedian.

They declare that the AI companies broke the law when they took their material from the internet without their authorization, and utilized it to train their systems.

The AI business argue that their actions fall under "fair use" and are for that reason exempt. There are a number of elements which can constitute fair usage - it's not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector is under increasing examination over how it collects training data and whether it need to be for it.

If this wasn't all adequate to ponder, Chinese AI company DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the past week. It became the many downloaded totally free app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek claims that it developed its innovation for a fraction of the cost of the likes of OpenAI. Its success has raised security concerns in the US, and threatens American's current supremacy of the sector.

As for me and a profession as an author, I believe that at the moment, if I actually want a "bestseller" I'll still have to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the present weakness in generative AI tools for larger tasks. It has lots of inaccuracies and hallucinations, and it can be rather tough to read in parts since it's so verbose.

But provided how rapidly the tech is developing, I'm not exactly sure the length of time I can remain positive that my substantially slower human writing and editing skills, are better.

Register for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the most significant advancements in international innovation, with analysis from BBC correspondents all over the world.

Outside the UK? Register here.